MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Truman Doctrine in Greece and Turkey: America's Cold War Fusion of Development and Security

2010· article· en· W2595054264 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kyle T. Evered

Bibliographic record

VenueArab world geographer · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Development and Aid
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPledgeDoctrineGeopoliticsCold warLawCoercion (linguistics)Administration (probate law)Political scienceCommunismPoliticsDisarmamentForeign policyPublic administration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Delivered as a speech to a joint session of Congress in March 1947, the Truman Doctrine was the decisive public statement of America's initial posture in an emergent Cold War era. Emphasizing the perceived need of all nationstates to achieve political and economic stability as a prerequisite to living “free from coercion,” Truman's words were interpreted by many supporters and by most critics as America's universal pledge to foster geopolitical security through the application of foreign assistance. Based on a critical reading both of the text itself as it evolved and of archival records from the conception of the program through its preliminary administration, this article examines the Truman Doctrine in terms of the post-World War II contexts of Greece and Turkey—the West's perceived gateways to the Middle East. In so doing, it identifies and evaluates recovery aid in these countries as the genesis of American's inextricable linking of humanitarian and security policy making in the developing world and ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.019
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab world geographerSame topicInternational Development and AidFrench-language works237,207