Speed of sound estimation for dual-stage virtual source ultrasound beamforming using point scatterers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synthetic transmit aperture beamforming is an increasingly used method to improve resolution in biomedical ultrasound imaging. Synthetic aperture sequential beamforming (SASB) is an implementation of this concept which features a relatively low computation complexity. Moreover, it can be implemented in a dual-stage architecture, where the first stage only applies simple single receive-focused delay-and-sum (srDAS) operations, while the second, more complex stage is performed either locally or remotely using more powerful processing. However, like traditional DAS-based beamforming methods, SASB is susceptible to inaccurate speed-of-sound (SOS) information. In this paper, we show how SOS estimation can be implemented using the srDAS beamformed image, and integrated into the dual-stage implementation of SASB, in an effort to obtain high resolution images with relatively low-cost hardware. Our approach builds on an existing per-channel radio frequency data-based direct estimation method, and applies an iterative refinement of the estimate. We use this estimate for SOS compensation, without the need to repeat the first stage beamforming. The proposed and previous methods are tested on both simulation and experimental studies. The accuracy of our SOS estimation method is on average 0.38% in simulation studies and 0.55% in phantom experiments, when the underlying SOS in the media is within the range 1450-1620 m/s. Using the estimated SOS, the beamforming lateral resolution of SASB is improved on average 52.6% in simulation studies and 50.0% in phantom experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".