MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595072688

Aboriginal cultural tourism marketing 'an issue of governance'

2015· article· en· W2595072688 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVictoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismSustainabilityMarketingPoliticsNegotiationBusinessNatural resourceCorporate governanceTourism geographyCommercializationDestinationsPublic relationsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionWhile the economic gains of tourism are being realized by several countries, there are concerns raised in the literature about the negative impact tourist visits have on community resources and local environments. Batra (2006) argues that marketers promote tourist destinations for monetary gains, but do not consider the increasing numbers of people who visit or the adverse effects they may have on the environment. Marketers, he claims, promote destinations to all who wish to come, without concern for the negative political, economic, social, or cultural consequences. Batra (2006) emphasizes that care must be taken to ensure sustainability of tourism while the long term integrity of human and natural resources is preserved.Butler and Waldbrook (2003) echo the same concerns for environmental sustainability while realizing the economic benefits which tourism can bring. Everyone involved in the development of tourism must keep in mind the long-term goal of the residents and implement controls to avert the increased pressures on tourism resources as a result of commercialization. Buhalis (2000) supports the ideas of the previous authors and emphasizes that destination marketing must balance the objectives of all stakeholders with the sustainability of local resources. Such an approach optimize tourism satisfaction while providing suitable gains for the region.The concerns outlined by these scholars are amplified when Aboriginal stakeholders, communities, and cultures come into play. In the following study, we survey Aboriginal destination marketing literature and governance structures before describing how this delicate negotiation plays out in one First Nation community. We then demonstrate the way in which the community's governance structure provides a model for the development of the cultural tourism industry.Aboriginal Destination MarketingClark (2008) argues that due to the forces of globalization, emphasis is placed on local (often Aboriginal) cultures to promote a niche market that differentiates themselves from competing destinations. To create tourism awareness, an ongoing program of media advertising and promotional events should be established to product knowledge with a focus on high quality and new Aboriginal products and destinations (Williams and Richter, 2002). Developing an effective industrybased communications channel with tour operators is a priority. Ffager (2003) asserts there are several key variables to successful promotion of Aboriginal communities to tourists, advising that developers build partnerships with native and non-native tourism operators; research your history and be accurate in what you portray; determine what is sacred and what to share; on major attraction and promote it to tourists; use proper media to get the message out; be a welcoming community and share with pride to the tourist sector; and choose the message carefully to represent your culture (p.4-5).Due to the nature of this niche market, Notzke (2004) believes it is best marketed as part of a regional or conceptual theme. She suggests that Aboriginal operators do not understand the requirements of tourism businesses and remain ignorant of the nature of the tourism industry.Alliances between Aboriginal communities and distribution channel operators should be developed (Williams and Richter, 2002). These operators can match the needs of product development and marketing actions to draw visitors to Aboriginal destinations. Aboriginal groups must be in charge of their products and destinations. Resultantly, joint ventures between Aboriginal entrepreneurs and tour operators to promote products of high quality and new products and destinations ought to be undertaken.Introduction to MembertouCape Breton Island is located off the eastern most portion of mainland Canada at roughly 47°N, 60°W (Brown, 2009). The indigenous peoples, the Mi'kmaq1, have lived in the region for approximately eleven thousand years and have had contact with Europeans for five hundred years. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it