MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595077335 · doi:10.1093/biolreprod/87.s1.615

GATA4 Is Required for Steroidogenesis in MA-10 Leydig Cells.

2012· article· en· W2595077335 on OpenAlexaff
Francis Bergeron, Robert S. Viger

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGATA4Leydig cellCell biologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineGeneticsHormoneTranscription factorLuteinizing hormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GATA4 is an essential transcription factor required for the development and function of multiple tissues derived from both mesoderm and endoderm. Among these tissues, Gata4 is highly expressed in the somatic cell lineages of the gonads in both sexes throughout development. Various knockout models in mice have demonstrated that GATA4 is essential for the onset of normal gonadal morphogenesis and is later recruited as an important regulator of genes required for the maintenance of normal male fertility. In spite of its essential role in reproduction, the genes and/or gene networks that are ultimately targeted and regulated by GATA4 remain to be fully understood. In males, testosterone production by testicular Leydig cells is essential for the initiation and maintenance of spermatogenesis. Leydig cells strongly express Gata4 at all stages of development. We and others have shown that GATA4 is an important activator of the promoters of several genes involved in the steroidogenic pathway such as steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (Star), P450scc (Cyp11a1) and 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (HSD3B2). Our hypothesis is that GATA4 is required for male fertility in part through the regulation of Leydig cell steroidogenesis. To test this hypothesis and to identify new GATA4-regulated gene targets in Leydig cells, we performed a microarray screening analysis of MA-10 Leydig cells that were knocked down for GATA4 using siRNAs directed against the GATA4 coding sequence. MA-10 cells are an ideal model for this knockdown strategy since they are known to contain almost exclusively GATA4 protein (unlike other testicular somatic cell lines that contain multiple GATA factors). MA-10 cells were therefore treated with either a control siRNA sequence or siRNA against GATA4. The treated cells (i.e., each treatment group) were divided into two preparations for analysis: one-half to verify that GATA4 was indeed knocked down by Western blot and the other half was used to prepare RNA for the microarray analysis. The microarray analysis revealed that a decrease in GATA4 protein in MA-10 cells was associated with a sharp decrease in the expression of multiple steroidogenic genes previously suspected to be GATA4 targets such as Cyp11a1 and especially Star. The knockdown of GATA4 also led to an important and unexpected decrease in other steroidogenic targets including steroid 5 alpha-reductase type 1 (Srd5a1), 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 and type 6 (Hsd3b1 and Hsd3b6). Quantitative real-time PCR was used to confirm the validity of the targets identified through the microarray screen. Finally, the decrease in GATA4 protein was found to severely compromise the ability of MA-10 cells to produce steroids (progesterone) both basally and under hormonal stimulation. Taken together, our data demonstrate that GATA4 is an essential transcription factor that is required for the expression of multiple genes involved in the steroidogenic pathway. This suggests that aberrant GATA4 function might be associated with several human pathologies that involve reduced fertility and diminished steroid hormone synthesis. This research was supported by CIHR grant MOP-14796 to RSV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207