MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595105659 · doi:10.18192/rceh.v40i3.1956

Arquitectura rural, espacio doméstico y masculinidad en varios poemas de Francisco de Quevedo

2016· article· es· W2595105659 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mar Martínez Góngora

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Literature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La representación de la vivienda y el espacio doméstico en varias composiciones de Francisco de Quevedo revelan preocupaciones relacionadas con la pérdida de virilidad debido al paso del tiempo, como es el caso del conocido soneto "Miré los muros de la patria mía", así como con la crisis de masculinidad causada por el lujo excesivo y las modas afeminadas de los nobles, que han desatendido sus obligaciones militares. Dichas metáforas resultan útiles no sólo para un recuento del desarrollo del sujeto masculino de la temprana modernidad, sino también para la expresión de un código de comportamiento que colabore en la solución de la decadencia política del Imperio. Mientras que en el soneto "A la huerta del duque de Lerma", se destaca la ejemplaridad de su dueño que se convierte en paradigma de conducta masculina, en "Dichoso tú que alegre en tu cabaña", el poeta propone un giro hacia la interioridad como resistencia al excesivo autoritarismo de la Monarquía de los Austrias. Esta noción se desarrolla con mayor intensidad en el soneto "Faltar pudo a Scipión Roma opulenta", así como en otros poemas compuestos por Quevedo durante su encerramiento en la Torre de Juan Abad.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Canadiense de Estudios HispánicosSame topicSpanish Literature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207