MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595165795 · doi:10.1182/blood.v106.11.119.119

Characterization of Distinct Molecular Signatures in Myeloproliferative Diseases with the JAK2V617F Mutation and Wild Type JAK2.

2005· article· en· W2595165795 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin L. Ebert, Ross L. Levine, Martha Wadleigh, Jean-Philippe Brunet, Jennifer Pretz, Lambert Buque, Stephanie J. Lee, D. Gary Gilliland, Todd R. Golub

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMutationGenePolycythemia veraPoint mutationMolecular biologyGene expression profilingMyeloproliferative DisordersGeneticsAllelePhenotypeGene expressionImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The recently discovered JAK2V617F mutation provides a critical insight into the molecular pathogenesis of polycythemia vera and other myeloproliferative diseases (MPD). However, the mutations present in patients with wild type JAK2 have not been discovered, and the precise molecular consequences of JAK2 mutation have not been elucidated. We employed gene expression profiling to characterize the molecular phenotype of cells with the JAK2V617F mutation, to identify a distinct signature in cells without JAK2 mutations, and to refine a molecular taxonomy of MPDs. Using purified neutrophils from 70 patients with myeloproliferative diseases and 11 unaffected individuals, we performed gene expression profiling using oligonucleotide microarrays, sequencing of the JAK2 gene, quantitative genotyping by mass spectrometry and allele-specific quantitative PCR, and X-inactivation clonality assays. To reduce the confounding influence of normal neutrophils that are admixed with cells bearing disease-causing mutations, we examined the gene expression profiles of samples in which greater than 80% of JAK2 alleles bear the V617F mutation. PRV1, a previously identified marker of polycythemia vera, was powerfully overexpressed in neutrophils with a homozygous JAK2 mutation. In addition, cells with the JAK2 mutation had increased expression of a set of kinases, including JAK2, and decreased expression of a set of phosphatases. Cells that rely on JAK2 activation for clonal dominance may therefore derive a selective advantage from increased expression of the JAK2 gene. We next examined samples that have high clonality, and therefore relatively few normal neutrophils, but do not have a mutation in the JAK2 gene. These samples have a markedly different gene expression profile and overexpress a distinct set of kinases. The kinases overexpressed in cells with wild type JAK2 are candidates for further mutational analysis and are potential therapeutic targets. Utilizing these signatures and unsupervised analytical algorithms, the samples cluster according to their mutational status and the percentage of normal neutrophils in the sample. Our data demonstrate that the gene expression profiles of MPD samples are not uniform regardless of JAK2 genotype, implying that samples with and without JAK2 mutations have not activated the same pathway via alternative mechanisms. Moreover, we have identified a common signature in samples without JAK2 mutations that meets significance, indicating that one or a small number of mutations may play a critical role in these cells. Genotype and gene expression analyses are defining a molecular classification of myeloproliferative diseases with subtypes that have distinct therapeutic targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207