The Routledge Companion to Science Fiction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genre Wars, Game On, Galactic Empire. Mark Bould, Andrew M. Butler, Adam Roberts, and Sheryl Vint, eds. The Routledge Companion to Science Fiction. New York: Routledge, 2009. 554 pp. ISBN 9780415453783. $51.95 he.Reviewed by Donald M. HasslerThe Futurians, John Campbell of Astounding, Jack Williamson, C. L. Moore, Henry Kuttner, and James Gunn, were all too young, along with many others, to view world sf as essentially anything other than the American Revolution of twentieth-century storytelling. Many of us here in the colonies know in our bones that they were right-and Campbell, with Asimov's Galactic fighting for him, has won all genre wars. But many were just too young to have experienced the singularity of the Great War and, great as their generation of writers with their generation of works were, what China Mieville in the final essay in The Routledge Companion to Science Fiction calls an awareness of total crisis never quite hit home (514). The Futurians toyed with Marxist ideas and with using story to effect social change. In the long run, however, they were most interested in hacking out American sf at the frontier. This was their world, and it was a new and good world, but much of the task of defining and describing sf in the twenty-first century has been undertaken in the UK. With the exception of Vint (a Canadian), the editors here are British and take their place with John Clute and Peter Nicholls (The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction) and Edward James and Farah Mendlesohn {The Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction) in the production of useful reference volumes. The battle is not just for categorization, reference, and details. It is a battle for the genre and what we used to call a of ideas. In fact, I think that together these essays ought not to be marketed as a reference volume. One reason this review is so late in coming is that The Routledge Companion resists labeling itself. If it is a companion, it is a very contentious one. The countries involved are not just nation states but the larger territory of ideas.One of the essays in Part III, Issues and Challenges, carries the huge title Empire and is subtly written by the brilliant Hungarian now working in Indiana, Istvan Csicsery Ronay, Jr. And yet it is a strange essay that seems more concerned with history and politics than with story. Readers will see that each of the four editors have also contributed well-written essays that push the boundaries of genre to the extreme-from some vague concept that Vint calls science studies to psychoanalysis for Butler. Clearly the editors seem to have accepted the American Revolution in modern literature totally, so that sf can now include virtually every interest in our complex culture. My hunch is that this takes the discussion a long way from the frontier and, to the point of this review, it takes the nature of The Routledge Companion from reference book to essay collection. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it