MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595317929

Tarptautinės jungtinės veiklos samprata tarptautinėje privatinėje teisėje

2007· article· lt· W2595317929 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laimonas Marcinkevičius

Bibliographic record

VenueJurisprudencija · 2007
Typearticle
Languagelt
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Governance and Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoint ventureInternational joint ventureJoint (building)BusinessManagementLaw and economicsLawBusiness administrationPolitical scienceEconomicsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article comparatively analyses genesis and concept of the international joint venture, which is one of the main contemporary forms of foreign investment and one of the most important fields of economy and a popular form of strategic co-operation in business, according to the law of Lithuania, USA, Canada as well as international private law. Main features and forms of the international joint venture, i.e. joint enterprise and contractual joint venture, have been researched. The article ends with formulation of the definition of the international joint venture in international private law and presentation of the main conclusions. The joint venture must be distinguished from other business co-operation agreements taking into consideration its subjective part, i.e. existence of joint purpose between its participants, as well as degree of integration of the latter. Cooperation between the parties may be called a joint venture only when that co-operation is based on a mutual contract, which provides for common purpose (project) that is planned to be reached (carried out) by participants of the joint venture, who contribute their efforts and/or property. However, such co-operation is not so close as to call it a complete merger or acquisition. Materially the joint venture may be manifested either by joint constitution of a new legal person or merely by a joint venture contract signed by and between its participants. Thus the joint venture may be understood in two main senses. In strict sense, the joint venture means a joint enterprise which is founded by its participants while implementing their common investment purpose (project); and they contribute their property, money and other values that are not prohibited by the laws into the capital and activities of that enterprise, in return receiving stocks (shares) of the founded enterprise; and it is agreed between them to share the profit, losses, management and control (the most integrated joint venture). The very term “joint enterprise” does not determine a particular legal form of that enterprise, even though usually a limited liability company is chosen in order to limit liability of the participants. In the broadest sense, the joint venture is an agreement under which the parties agree to act together in order to reach some purpose or pursue some activity, and their property, work or knowledge is combined to that end; however, none new legal unit is founded (the least integrated joint venture).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurisprudencijaSame topicCorporate Governance and LawFrench-language works237,207