MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595342884 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.032

Performance of R407C as an Alternate to R22: A Review

2017· review· en· W2595342884 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefrigerantMontreal ProtocolEnergy consumptionRetrofittingEnvironmental scienceEngineeringEnvironmental economicsOzone layerMeteorologyMechanical engineeringEconomicsOzoneGeographyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The outcome of R407C as a drop in replacement of R22 has been reviewed in this paper. As per Montreal Protocol, R22 is going to be phase out due to its unfavourable impacts related to environment e.g. ozone depletion potential (ODP) and global warming potential (GWP). R407C has zero ODP and considerably GWP as compared to R22. The releasing of refrigerants in the surroundings becomes the cause of issues pertinent in environment. A detailed review about the experimental studies associated with the performance of R407C is provided. The aim is to put together all the diversified information about the R407C in a single paper. It is found after the careful observation that R22 performs somewhat better than R407C in many aspects i.e. COP, Cooling Capacity, Energy Consumption, and Exergetic Analysis but retrofitting point of view, it is best suitable refrigerant and R410A is suitable for new design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it