The Role of gas6 in Venous Thrombosis In Vivo.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 3057 Poster Board II-1033 Gas6 is the vitamin-K dependent protein product of growth arrest specific gene 6. A genetic deficiency of this protein protects mice against experimentally induced thrombosis without causing a bleeding diathesis. Protection from thrombosis results from a deficiency in platelet aggregation and secretion. In addition to being expressed by platelets, Gas6 and its receptors are also expressed by vascular cells including the endothelium, an organ known to play a role in the hemostatic balance. While endothelial Gas6 has been shown to promote inflammation and cell survival, it remains unknown if it contributes to the pathophysiology of venous thrombosis. To answer this question, we employed a bone marrow transplantation (BMT) strategy using wild type and Gas6 null mice to create chimeric mice with combined genotypes in the vascular and platelet compartments. Mice were exposed to a dose of radiation optimized to maximize both survival and ablation of recipient marrow. Irradiated mice were then infused with bone marrow cells isolated from the femurs and tibias of donor mice and were allowed a one month recovery period for hematologic reconstitution. Success of marrow uptake was confirmed by PCR. They were then subjected to the Ferric Chloride model of venous thrombosis in the Inferior Vena Cava (IVC). Four groups of transplanted mice were studied. Results from these BMT experiment show a contributing effect by both endothelial as well as platelet Gas6 to thrombus formation (n=8, p<0.01). Mice with combined genotypes (Gas6-/- into WT and WT into Gas6 -/-) show an intermediate thrombus weight suggesting that both vascular and platelet derived Gas6 are both responsible for thrombosis pathology. Therefore, Gas6 at both sites could be potential targets in treating venous thrombosis. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".