MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595359543 · doi:10.1088/2053-1583/aa62e8

Mechanical instability driven self-assembly and architecturing of 2D materials

2017· article· en· W2595359543 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Michael Cai Wang, Juyoung Leem, Pilgyu Kang, Jonghyun Choi, Peter M. Knapp, Keong Yong, SungWoo Nam

Bibliographic record

Venue2D Materials · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Materials and Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchDivision of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsInstabilityMaterials scienceGeologyMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two-dimensional (2D) materials have been well studied for their diverse and impressive properties and superlative mechanical strength. Their atomic thinness and weak van der Waals interaction, while fascinating and unique, dictate their tendency to exhibit out of plane morphologies such as bending, buckling, folding, rippling, scrolling, and wrinkling, etc. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms behind these instability driven morphologies and the resultant phenomena that arise. We then survey methods to manipulate them especially in a scalable manner, and elucidate some interesting applications uniquely enabled by these structures. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the deterministic control of these features has great implications for the local and overall material properties due to heterogeneous distribution of stresses and strains. The introduction of deformable and shape memory substrates especially allow for facile and large scale synthesis of various types of out of plane morphologies. We show that a variety of exciting phenomena and applications arise, including tunable surfaces and coatings, robust devices and electronics, adaptive optoelectronics, material toughening, energy storage, and chemical sensing. This new perspective on these otherwise nuisance thin-film phenomena enable new tools for future materials discovery, design, and synthesis with the ever growing library of 2D atomically thin materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2D MaterialsSame topicAdvanced Materials and MechanicsFrench-language works237,207