MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

EVOLUTION OF SCHEMES OF HEAT EXCHANGE IN A BLAST FURNACE

2016· article· sh· W2595410443 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIzvestiya Ferrous Metallurgy · 2016
Typearticle
Languagesh
FieldEngineering
TopicIron and Steelmaking Processes
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlast furnaceSmeltingCokeMetallurgyThermalHeat exchangerWork (physics)Materials scienceEnvironmental scienceWaste managementEngineeringMechanical engineeringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of schemes of heat exchange in a blast furnace was considered with the improvement of the blast furnace smelting technology. It was noted that for the estimation of the thermal state of blast furnace as a control object it is expedient to divide it into two thermal zones, upper and bottom. The interface between them is in the top of the mixed recovery between the level of the beginning of the carbon gasifi cation of coke and the horizon, below which iron oxides are directly reduced. Upper slow heat exchange section in terms of heat exchange is reserve height providing better thermal and regenerative operation of the furnace. The bottom section of slow heat exchange should not be used as a reserve for improvement of thermal and reduction work of the blast furnace. It is shown that the presence of two zones of intense heat exchange in the present conditions of smelting of various types of iron ore using the combined blowing of high parameters is a prerequisite for the stability of the course of the blast furnace process and effi ciency of smelting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it