MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595579230 · doi:10.1214/17-aos1676

Think globally, fit locally under the manifold setup: Asymptotic analysis of locally linear embedding

2018· article· en· W2595579230 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Annals of Statistics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMathematicsManifold (fluid mechanics)EmbeddingApplied mathematicsRegularization (linguistics)Nonlinear dimensionality reductionLaplace transformKernel (algebra)Markov chainMathematical analysisStatisticsPure mathematicsDimensionality reductionArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since its introduction in 2000, Locally Linear Embedding (LLE) has been widely applied in data science. We provide an asymptotical analysis of LLE under the manifold setup. We show that for a general manifold, asymptotically we may not obtain the Laplace–Beltrami operator, and the result may depend on nonuniform sampling unless a correct regularization is chosen. We also derive the corresponding kernel function, which indicates that LLE is not a Markov process. A comparison with other commonly applied nonlinear algorithms, particularly a diffusion map, is provided and its relationship with locally linear regression is also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it