MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595581606

Nationhood Interrupted: Revitalizing Nêhiyaw Legal Systems

2015· article· en· W2595581606 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of native studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLaw in Society and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousKinshipGenocideSociologyLawPolitical scienceGenealogyHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sylvia McAdam (Saysewahum), Nationhood Interrupted: Revitalizing nehiyaw Legal Systems. Saskatoon: Purich, 2015. 120 pages. ISBN 9781895830-804. $25.00 paperback.The main aim of Nationhood Interrupted detail how Nehiyaw people can live lawfully. After reading, I am of the opinion that McAdam makes an excellent contribution our knowledge of what it means live lawfully as Nehiyaw people. 1 am also Nehiyaw and grew up in Maskwacis, a community referenced in the book. Nationhood Interrupted a welcome addition the field of Nehiyaw literature and will be an important point of reference for Nehiyaw people and for other Indigenous and non-Indigenous people who are concerned with Indigenous law.For me, McAdam makes two key contributions Nehiyaw literature. First, McAdam discusses the important role of women in Cree law and how colonization and genocide have impacted women. Second, McAdam does an excellent job of setting the work within a relational framework, one based on Cree understandings of wahkohtowin. Wâhkohtowin a term that translates as kinship but it also a philosophical concept that is used describe the kinship connections all of (60). Scholars seeking work within the nascent relational paradigm will find a great deal of value in this book and I would also recommend it those seeking research and learn about Indigenous understandings of Treaty Six.The core of Nationhood Interrupted chapter three, manitow wiyinikewina. This chapter discusses four aspects of Cree law. Pâstâmowin deals with harmful language against humans. Ohcinemowin, in comparison, deals with harmful language against other elements of creation (39). Likewise, pâstâhowin when a law transgressed against other humans, while ohcinewin when a law transgressed against other elements of creation (43). For example, repeating a tale as told by Juliette McAdam Saysewahum, the author discusses some of the reasoning behind laws of pâstâmowin: An old woman heard a young man gossiping his friends. The woman takes the young man aside and asks the young man help her pluck feathers. She takes him the top of a hill and says, Throw the duck feathers into the wind. She and then tells the young man pick up the feathers. After a long time he returned the old woman and said, T can't pick up every feather, it's impossible'. The young man then told when you gossip 'you don't know where your words have gone and take back what you say nearly impossible' (48-49). I liked the way this passage conveyed the importance of following laws of pâstâmowin in how we chose speak about others.The other chapters of the book also offer many important insights and analysis. Chapter two discusses the importance of raising children to become lawful nehiyaw citizens (29). Chapter four focuses on the relationship between land and pimacihowin (livelihood) and discusses how the treaties were meant ensure pimacihowin for future generations. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.142
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it