MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595635619 · doi:10.18192/rceh.v40i3.1958

Nature-Deficit Disorder in the Mexican Dystopia: Carlos Fuentes, Carmen Boullosa, and Homero Aridjis

2016· article· es· W2595635619 on OpenAlex
Adam Spires

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeography and Environmental Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente estudio tiene como fin analizar el vínculo entre el medioambiente y la psicología en las novelas más representativas del género distópico en la literatura mexicana: Cristóbal nonato de Carlos Fuentes, Cielos de la Tierra de Carmen Boullosa, La leyenda de los soles y ¿En quién piensas cuando haces el amor? de Homero Aridjis. Partiendo de un marco teórico basado en la ecopsicología, se analiza en estas novelas el motivo que, para los fines de nuestro estudio, denominamos el "nature-deficit disorder". Mientras estas novelas han sido analizadas por sus temas de la globalización y del poscolonialismo, el motivo de la psicosis acarreada por la destrucción de la naturaleza no ha recibido el mismo nivel de atención crítica a pesar de ser un fundamento primordial del género en cuestión.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it