A cultura e a diversidade no acesso e uso do portal periódicos da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, have 53 scientific journals, and at February 2007 began studies to using the Canadian Open Journal System - OJS as an information source to the scientific knowledge dissemination produced by these university. This study reports Portal of Journals UFSC creation (http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br) as a free information source. Presents the 14 editors journals opinion, advantages and problems on using the electronic publishing scientific journal software. Some difficulties reported by the editors, there is a need to know the different functions by the editors process. Using the wiki environment (http://oficinaseer. wikidot.com) exchange experiences and learning space for all publishers and trainees. At the end 2008 eighteen (18) journals concluded the data migration process and begin journal’s indexing at international databases, and the international visibility has already reached over 500 thousand access from more than 90 countries (http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/awstats/awstats.pl)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.035 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".