A Nazi Pilgrimage to Vienna? The French Delegation at the 1941 “Mozart Week of the German Reich”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From 28 November to 5 December 1941, National-Socialist authorities in Vienna presented a “Mozart Week of the German Reich” to commemorate the 150th anniversary of the composer’s death. Culminating on the exact day of the anniversary (5 December), the Mozart Week constituted the climax of an entire year of Mozart-related celebrations coordinated throughout the Reich, the Axis, and the occupied territories by Joseph Goebbels’s Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda.1 All of these events—ranging from concert series and opera performances to full-blown festivals lasting several days—pursued the same goal: displaying the Reich’s cultural greatness, its affluence in spite of the war, and ultimately, its supremacy over the “new Europe.” This broad operation of cultural propaganda corresponded to a turning point in the evolution of the war. When the Mozart Week was conceived in the first months of 1941, the German Reich was at the peak of its power, and was already considering breaking its Non-Aggression Pact with the Soviet Union in order to gain even more territory and overpower Great Britain.2 After the actual invasion of 22 June 1941, the situation changed drastically: it soon became clear that the Wehrmacht would not be able to crush its new opponent in a Blitzkrieg, as it had planned to, and that the battle against the Soviet Union would be a long, difficult, and hazardous one. By September 1941, the German Reich’s ambitious military objectives in the Soviet Union had become unattainable,3 and eventually the increasingly difficult situation on the Eastern Front developed into one of the central causes of the Reich’s defeat in 1945.4
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".