MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595725800 · doi:10.15353/vsnl.v2i1.91

A Compact Field-portable Computational Multispectral Microscope using Integrated Raspberry Pi

2016· article· en· W2595725800 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Jason Deglint, Kuil Schoneveld, Farnoud Kazemzadeh, Alexander Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Vision and Imaging Systems · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicImage Processing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsAchromatic lensMultispectral imageBroadbandOpticsMicroscopyMicroscopeComputer scienceHyperspectral imagingOptical microscopeMaterials scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligencePhysicsScanning electron microscope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a compact field-portable computationalmultispectral microscopy system powered by an integrated RaspberryPi computer. The optical components of the low-cost, compactmicroscopy system consists of a cemented achromatic doubletlens place on top of a Raspberry Pi camera module, used tocapture magnified broadband microscopy imaging acquisitions atthree broadband channels in the visible spectrum based on theBayer pattern color filter array. The captured broadband microscopyacquisitions are then processed by a numerical spectral demultiplexer,which demultiplexes the magnified broadband acquisitionsto generate a set of narrowband microscopy images. A Helianthusstem was imaged using the proposed computational multispectralmicroscopy system, and demonstrated to be able to produce narrowbandmicroscopy images at 16 different wavelengths with a singleacquisition without the need for wavelength scanning, whichmakes it well-suited for fast microscopy imaging applications suchas the study of transient phenomenona.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational Vision and Imaging SystemsSame topicImage Processing Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207