The quantum entanglement between colorful dark energy universes in a colorful multiverse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, a model for colorful black hole production and decay in proton–proton collisions has been constructed. These results can be extended to a multiverse, because it is obvious that there is enough energy in cosmic rays to produce a baby Universe. It is observed that these Universes are defined by their gauge charges. Notably, Universes can have a color charge. This is not in contradiction with confinement because the typical length scale of QCD (i.e., a Fermi) is much larger than the size of a baby Universe at its birth. These colorful Universes can interact with each other, annihilate, and form a color singlet Universe. Next, it is argued that color confinement may generate an entanglement between colorful dark energy Universes to form a color singlet binary system. Finally, the production cross section for entangled colorful dark energy Universes in a multiverse is obtained. It is found that the cross section of a Friedmann–Robertson–Walker Universe is much larger for smaller values of the Hubble parameter. Also, this cross section is greater for entangled open Universes and smaller for entangled closed Universes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".