MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595732553 · doi:10.22436/jnsa.010.03.25

Some families of generalized complete and incomplete elliptic-type integrals

2017· article· en· W2595732553 on OpenAlex
H. M. Srivastava, Rakesh K. Parmar, Purnima Chopra

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Applications · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical functions and polynomials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsType (biology)Pure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analogous to the recent generalizations of the familiar beta and hypergeometric functions by Lin et al. [S.-D. Lin, H. M. Srivastava, J.-C. Yao, Appl. Math. Inform. Sci., 9 (2015), 1731–1738], the authors introduce and investigate some general families of the elliptic-type integrals for which the usual properties and representations are naturally and simply extended. The object of the present paper is to study these generalizations and their relationships with generalized hypergeometric functions of one, two and three variables. Moreover, the authors establish the Mellin transform formulas and various derivative and integral properties and obtain several relations for special cases in terms of well-known higher transcendental functions and some infinite series representations containing the Meijer G-function, the Whittaker function and the complementary error functions, as well as the Laguerre polynomials and the products thereof. A number of (known or new) special cases and consequences of the main results presented here are also considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it