MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595737179

Towards A Business Intelligence FrameworkFor Healthcare Safety

2010· article· en· W2595737179 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Dominique Ferr, Daniel Amyot, Carlos Villar Corrales

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicQuality and Safety in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careComputer scienceIBMBusiness intelligenceEvent (particle physics)Patient safetyData scienceKnowledge management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canadian hospitals, literature estimates the number of adverse events that are preventable to be 70,000 annually. As a first step towards controlling and reducing such undesirable safety outcomes, it is necessary to quantify and understand their causes. In this paper, we present a Business Intelligence framework to support the definition and reporting of metrics in healthcare. We tailor the Goal-Question-Metrics framework to the specifics of adverse event monitoring in a teaching hospital, and prototype a solution using the IBM Cognos 8 tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Internet Banking and CommerceSame topicQuality and Safety in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207