Physical Modeling of P-wave Reflectivity in TTI Media Using Ultrasonic Techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary In this contribution, we experimentally test the effects of azimuth and tilt angle on the acoustic reflectivity of a liquid- anisotropic solid interface. For this study, we are using a large source transducer, and acquired data for samples with different tilt angles. We use Phenolic CE material, which is known to have weakly orthorhombic symmetry. Our results show that changes of the tilt angle produce important variations on the reflectivity that are larger as the tilt increases. The most remarkable feature is the change of the critical angle with the azimuth, which shows a larger spread for larger tilts. The spectral components of the acquired waveforms also show characteristic features linked to the location of the critical angle, we particularly observed a drop in the peak frequency. These observations suggest that care must be taken about the interpretation and inversion of observed incidence and azimuth dependent seismic reflectivities and critical angles in obtaining information on a formation’s anisotropy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".