MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

¡Que se vayan Todos!

2002· article· es· W2595805407 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
John W. Holloway

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Political Economy · 2002
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En los ?ltimos nueve meses, desde el 11 de septiembre, el grito se ha vuelto m?s agudo, m?s estridente. Es el horror de lo que vemos a nuestro alrededor: las bombas cayendo, la violencia contra los inmigrantes, los 35.000 ni?os que mueren de enfermedades curables cada d?a, la ciega arrogancia de los capitalistas y sus pol?ticos, las presiones sobre todos nosotros para renunciar a nuestros sue?os de un mundo de dignidad, el peligro real de que nosotros, nuestros hijos o nietos estaremos presentes cuando el capital finalmente des truya a la humanidad. A todo esto s?lo podemos gritar ?NO! NO es la base de la gram?tica de la rebeli?n, la gram?tica de la revuelta, la gram?tica de la revoluci?n.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.194

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0580.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Political EconomySame topicSocial Sciences and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207