MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

COHERENT Experiment: current status

2017· article· en· W2595816158 on OpenAlexaff
D. Akimov, J. B. Albert, C. Awe, P. S. Barbeau, Bruce Becker, V. Belov, A. Bolozdynya, A. Burenkov, Belkis Cabrera-Palmer, M. Cervantes, J. I. Collar, R.J. Cooper, R. L. Cooper, C. Cuesta, D. J. Dean, M. del Valle Coello, J. A. Detwiler, A. Dolgolenko, M. D’Onofrio, Andrew Eberhardt, Y. V. Efremenko, S. R. Elliott, A. Etenko, L. Fabris, Nicole D. Fields, W. Fox, A. Galindo-Uribarri, M. P. Green, M. R. Heath, S. Hedges, Erik B. Iverson, L. J. Kaufman, А. В. Хромов, A. M. Konovalov, A. G. Kovalenko, A. Kumpan, L. Li, Wei Lu, Kulwinder Singh Mann, Y. Melikyan, D. M. Markoff, K. Miller, P. E. Mueller, P P Naumov, J. Newby, D. S. Parno, S. Penttilä, G. Perumpilly, D. C. Radford, H. Ray, J. Raybern, D. Reyna, G. C. Rich, D. Rimal, D. Rudik, K. Scholberg, Bjorn Scholz, G. Sinev, W. M. Snow, V. Sosnovtsev, A. Shakirov, S. Suchyta, B. Suh, R. Tayloe, R. T. Thornton, I. Tolstukhin, J. Vanderwerp, K. Vetter, C. J. Virtue, C.-H. Yu, J. Zettlemoyer, A. Zderic

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
FundersOak Ridge National LaboratoryAlfred P. Sloan Foundation
KeywordsSpallation Neutron SourcePhysicsNuclear physicsScintillatorNeutrinoOak Ridge National LaboratoryDetectorSpallationNeutronElastic scatteringScatteringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COHERENT Collaboration is realizing a long term neutrino physics research program. The main goals of the program are to detect and study elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEνNS). This process is predicted by Standard Model but it has never been observed experimentally because of the very low energy of the recoil nucleus. COHERENT is using different detector technologies: CsI[Na] and NaI scintillator crystals, a single-phase liquid Ar and a Ge detectors. The placement of all the detector setups is in the basement of the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The current status of the COHERENT experimental program is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.050
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0500.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.015
Open science0.0050.007
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207