MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595869698 · doi:10.1093/biolreprod/81.s1.167

PABP Interacting Protein 2 (Paip2) Is a Major Translational Regulator Involved in the Maturation of Male Germ Cells and Male Fertility.

2009· article· en· W2595869698 on OpenAlexaff
Géraldine Delbès, Akiko Yanagiya, Nahum Sonenberg, Bernard Robaire

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpermiogenesisBiologySpermatogenesisSpermatidGerm cellCell biologyMessenger RNASpermAndrologyGeneMolecular biologyGeneticsEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paip2 regulates translation by promoting the dissociation of PABP (PolyA Binding Protein) from the poly(A)tails of mRNA. There are 2 homologs of Paip2,Paip2A and Paip2B, that are highly expressed in the pancreas. In the testis, Paip2A is highly expressed whereas Paip2B levels are low. During spermatogenesis, mRNAs are stored in the male germ cells as transcription is active until early spermiogenesis in round spermatids. Translation is tightly regulated during spermiogenesis since, in the absence of any transcriptional activity, several proteins are only expressed at very specific steps. Some mechanisms by which translation is regulated during the late phase of spermatogenesis have been suggested but this remains unclear. Using immunohistochemistry, we have shown that Paip2A and PABP are both specifically expressed in the testicular germ cells showing an overlapping expression during spermiogenesis. Paip2A is expressed in spermatids from steps 7-8 of spermiogenesis until the sperm are released. PABP starts to be expressed in the pachytene spermatocytes at stages 5 and its expression increases gradually in the round spermatids, to finally disappear in the elongating spermatids at step 15 of spermiogenesis. In order to understand the role of Paip2 in spermatogenesis and male fertility, we characterized a double knock-out (DKO) transgenic mouse lineage in which both Paip2A and Pai2B genes were inactivated. By continuous mating with wild type (wt) partners, we showed that DKO females presented normal fertility whereas DKO male mice were infertile. When compared to wt males, the DKO males had a 6% lower body weight as well as significantly lower epididymal (25% less) and prostatic weights (71% less). No spermatozoa could be found in the cauda epididymidis and the testis sperm head count was significantly decreased by 64%. Histological examination of the testes revealed abnormalities with vacuolization in some tubules and abnormal alignment of the spermatozoa at the lumen at stages 7-8, thus suggesting that the elongated spermatids in the DKO mouse are retained and cannot be released into the lumen properly. Moreover, we have shown an abnormal expression of PABP in the single Paip2A knock-out male germ cells where PABP is still expressed in elongated spermatids at stage 8 and staining can be found in the lumen all along the epididymis. We hypothesize that Paip2 translation factors are major players in the development of male germ cells, regulating the translation of key proteins involved in chromatin condensation and sperm release during spermiogenesis. Supported by CIHR. (platform)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207