MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595879464 · doi:10.2298/tsci160110072l

Analytical modelling of dry-jet wet spinning

2017· article· en· W2595879464 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThermal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTextile materials and evaluations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research FundsPriority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education InstitutionsChina Scholarship CouncilChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationChina National Textile and Apparel CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSpinningMaterials scienceMechanicsJet (fluid)ComputationFiberFlow (mathematics)Computer simulationComposite materialPhysicsComputer scienceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces an analytical method for the analysis and design of a dry-jet wet spinning system. The 1-D mass conservation equation is used, and velocity distribution is assumed to derive a simple relationship among various spinning parameters. The effect of spinneret mass flow rate, solution density, spinneret structure including velocity and air-gap length, and drawing velocity on the dry-jet wet spinning was simulated using the proposed analytical model. Theoretical prediction of fiber diameter is obtained, which depends upon spinning conditions, solution properties, and spinneret structure. The theoretical results were verified by comparing experimental data with the numerical solution. It was found obviously that the theoretical prediction has comparable accuracy as that by numerical computation. The analytical model can be useful for preliminary design of a spinning process for fabrication of fibers with controllable diameter by adjusting parameters in spinning conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it