MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595909262 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22835

Development of model systems for in vitro investigation of transdermal transport pathways

2017· article· en· W2595909262 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Roberta Liuzzi, Valentina Preziosi, Sergio Caserta, Stefano Guido

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicAdvancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransdermalIn vitroPharmacologyChemistryMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Skin is a complex structured system primarily involved in Transdermal Drug Delivery (TDD). The outer s tratum corneum represents the main barrier to the entrance of external molecules. Nowadays, none of the recognized methods, used for the investigation of penetration processes, is able to give a complete overview of the transport mechanisms involved. Standard protocols are based on the use of human or animal skin samples, which are difficult and expensive to obtain. Here, we present a novel experimental setup to investigate TDD by using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy and image analysis. The methodology is based on diffusion experiments of fluorescent‐labelled fluids (water, oil, and oil‐in‐water emulsions), in a model matrix. Using an agarose gel as model for a proof of concept, different penetration efficiencies were observed, suggesting an important role of both chemical composition and fluid microstructure on the transport mechanism. An adequate model system should be used to better mimic the stratum corneum morphology and properties. To this aim, several bicontinuous emulsion gels, obtained from an emulsification process, were preliminary formulated and suggested as model systems to mimic the stratum corneum . In this work, we define the key directions for the development of an innovative approach to study the penetration of formulations through the skin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAdvancements in Transdermal Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207