MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A phase II study of suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) in subjects with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC).

2013· article· en· W2595933696 on OpenAlexaff
Priscila Gonçalves, Shivaani Kummar, Lillian L. Siu, Aaron R. Hansen, P. Savvides, Ammar Sukari, Joseph Chao, Lance K. Heilbrun, Mary Jo Pilat, Daryn Smith, Lindsay Casetta, Scott A. Boerner, Patricia LoRusso

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineAdverse effectGastroenterologyPhases of clinical researchAdenoid cystic carcinomaClinical endpointChemotherapyProgression-free survivalSurgeryCarcinomaClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

6045 Background: SAHA is a small molecule inhibitor of histone deacetylases (HDAC). Based on confirmed responses noted in 2 ACC patients treated with SAHA at our institution; we initiated this phase II trial. Methods: Patients with LA, recurrent or metastatic ACC and adequate organ function were eligible. Any prior number of chemotherapy regimens was allowed. Tumor tissue and blood were collected for correlative studies. SAHA was administered orally 400 mg daily for 28 days. The primary objective was to evaluate response rate (RR). Secondary endpoints included: time to tumor response (TTR); response duration (RD); progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS); and adverse events (AE). 29 evaluable patients were needed in a Simon 2-stage optimal design to distinguish RR of at most 5% vs. at least 20%, with alpha = 0.15 and power = 0.90. Results: 30 evaluable patients (overenrolled by 1) were accrued from at 5 different centers between August 2010 and June 2012. Median follow up among the censored patients is 3.8 months for PFS, and 7.2 months for OS. 19 patients were female, 24 were Caucasian, median age was 53 years (range 21-73); 21 patients had a performance status of 1; 20 patients were chemo-naïve. The median number of cycles completed was 5 (range 1-27+). Lymphopenia (n=5), hypertension (n=3), oral pain (n=2), thromboembolic events (n=2) and fatigue (n=2) were the only grade 3 AEs that occurred in more than 1 patient. 5 patients were dose reduced due to AEs. At the time of data cut-off, 9/30/2012, 1 patient with lung metastasis had a PR, with RD of 11.2+ months. TTR was 7.7 months. SD was the best response in 25 patients. Median PFS is 12.7 months (90% confidence interval lower limit: 3.7 months). Median OS has not been reached. There were 6 patients with PFS > 1 year. The correlative studies results will be presented. Conclusions: SAHA shows promise in the treatment of ACC. We are awaiting genomic analysis of the tumors to study the basis of clinical benefit (PR and SD) of SAHA in ACC. Future drug combination studies in ACC are being considered focusing on the epigenetic mechanism of SAHA. Supported by 5U01CA062487/19. Clinical trial information: NCT01175980.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.372 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchFrench-language works237,207