MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2596021134 · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2017.03.004

Adding Mirabegron to Solifenacin to Treat Overactive Bladder Has Little Impact on Postvoid Residual Volume or Urinary Retention Risk

2017· article· en· W2596021134 on OpenAlexaff
Marcus J. Drake, Scott MacDiarmid, С Х Аль-Шукри, Jack Barkin, Aino Fianu-Jonasson, Sender Herschorn, Moses Huang, Matthias Stoelzel, Emad Siddiqui

Bibliographic record

VenueUrology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreHealth Sciences CentreHumber River Regional HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersAstellas Pharma EuropeAstellas Pharma Global DevelopmentAstellas PharmaAstellas Pharma US
KeywordsUrinary retentionMedicineUrologyUrinary systemUrinary urgencyOveractive bladderInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urinary retention is a complex and important urologic health issue that describes the inability to completely empty the bladder.1 The sudden inability to void is termed acute urinary retention, which is usually accompanied by pain and severe urgency, and can have serious consequences if untreated.2 Occasionally, acute urinary retention may be precipitated by an event such as infection or medication; thus, the definition is further subdivided into precipitated or spontaneous.1 Chronic urinary retention describes the persistent inability to completely empty the bladder and is usually painless and imperceptible to the patient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUrologySame topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207