MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2596043685 · doi:10.15353/vsnl.v2i1.114

A Bayesian Multi-Scale Framework for Photoplethysmogram Imaging Waveform Processing

2016· article· en· W2596043685 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Brendan Chwyl, Robert Amelard, David A. Clausi, Alexander Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Vision and Imaging Systems · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsOntario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
KeywordsPhotoplethysmogramWaveformComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSignal processingFidelitySIGNAL (programming language)Scale (ratio)Rendering (computer graphics)Computer visionPattern recognition (psychology)TelecommunicationsDigital signal processingComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photoplethysmography imaging (PPGI) is an increasingly populartechnique for remotely creating signals with a plethora of medicalinformation, referred to as PPGI waveforms. However, PPGI waveformsare often heavily affected by illumination variation and motionartefacts. Current PPGI waveform processing methods are usefulfor estimating heart rate, however, structural detail is not preserved,rendering the signal incapable of providing additional medical information.For this reason, we propose a multi-scale framework basedon the Bayesian residual transform which aims to suppress noiseand preserve structural details necessary for extracting cardiovascularinformation beyond the scope of heart rate. Experiments conductedon a dataset consisting of 24 different PPGI waveforms andcorresponding PPG waveforms captured via a finger pulse oximetersuggests a high level of noise and ambient illumination variationsuppression is achieved while signal fidelity is largely retained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational Vision and Imaging SystemsSame topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207