Bibliographic record
Abstract
We address the problem of determining the limiting energetic ring current ion spectrum resulting from electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC)-wave-ion interactions. We solve the problem in a relativistic regime, incorporating a cold background multi-ion plasma component and without assuming a predetermined form for the ion energy distribution. The limiting (Kennel-Petschek) spectrum is determined by the condition that the EMIC waves acquire a specified gain over a given convective length scale for all frequencies over which wave growth occurs. We find that the limiting ion spectrum satisfies an integral equation that must be solved numerically. However, at large particle energy E, the limiting spectrum takes the simple form J ∝ 1/E, E → ∞. Moreover, this 1/E spectral shape does not depend on the energetic ion in question nor on the background multi-ion plasma composition. We provide numerical solutions for the limiting spectra for Earth-like parameters. In addition, at four planets, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, we compare measured ion spectra with corresponding numerical limiting spectra. This paper parallels an earlier analogous study on the limitation of radiation belt electron spectra by whistler mode wave-electron interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".