MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2596355018

Computational studies of combustion processes and oxygenated species

2007· article· en· W2596355018 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Carrigan J. Hayes

Bibliographic record

VenueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster UniversityOhio State UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCombustionEnvironmental scienceChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Within this dissertation, we report on explorations of reactive oxygen species with implications for combustion and atmospheric chemistry.Various computational approaches, including density functional theory (DFT) and master equation methods, were used to complete these projects.The majority of this thesis involves the oxidation pathways of the alkylated heterocycles that provide a model framework for understanding coal combustion.The enthalpies and energies of reaction for hydrogen-atom loss and alkyl-group fragmentations at various temperatures were calculated via density functional theory (B3LYP/6-311+G**//B3LYP/6-31G*); these results were calibrated against CBS-QB3 calculations.It was suggested that both hydrogen-atom loss and alkyl-group loss reactions will contribute as initiation steps for the high-temperature combustion reactions of these rings.Longer alkyl chains will increase reactivity, and the azabenzene units are more likely to react than the five-membered heterocyclic rings.The initial steps of radical formation are expected to become more favorable at high temperatures.The oxidation steps of these radicals were shown to be exothermic and exoergic, as expected.DFT studies (B3LYP/6-311+G**//B3LYP/6-31G*) showed that these resultant peroxy radicals were more likely to undergo intramolecular reactions to form bicyclic structures.Furthermore, several pathways seemed feasible and must be I would like to thank Dr. Christopher Hadad for his advice, support, and guidance over my time at The Ohio State University; I have learned a great deal both from his words as an advisor and his example as a teacher.I thank members of the Hadad group, past and present, for their thoughtful explanations and thorough discussions.I have worked with Reaction Design and McMaster Fuel and am indebted to these companies' expertise

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)Same topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207