MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Congenital Macrothrombocytopenia and Defective Localization of the Nonmuscle Myosin Heavy Chain IIA in Leukocytes and Megakaryocytes with a Normal MYH9 Gene.

2004· article· en· W2596371246 on OpenAlexaff
Walter H.A. Kahr, Ling Li, Chanchai Traivaree, Hilary Christensen, Tara Paton, Sheila E. Butchard, Julie Curtin, Victor S. Blanchette

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMyosinPathologyMolecular biologyPlateletImmunofluorescenceInclusion bodiesGeneAntibodyImmunologyCell biologyMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Autosomal dominant macrothrombocytopenias such as the May-Hegglin anomaly, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and Epstein syndrome are all characterized by mutations in the MYH9 gene. It has been proposed that these MYH9-related diseases are not distinct entities but represent a variable expression of a single disorder with a continuous clinical spectrum varying from mild macrothrombocytopenia with leukocyte inclusions to more severe conditions encompassing hearing loss, cataracts and renal failure. Mutations in the MYH9 gene cause abnormal expression and/or function of the 224 kDa nonmuscle myosin heavy chain IIA (NMMHC-IIA) protein. Class II myosins are hexameric complexes composed of 2 heavy chains and 2 pairs of light chains forming a structure containing 2 N-terminal globular domains and an elongated α-helical C-terminal tail. Since identical mutations in the MYH9 gene cause variable clinical presentations in different patients, other factors likely modulate the mutant phenotype. We describe a patient with congenital macrothrombocytopenia, mild bleeding problems, Döhle-like leukocyte inclusion bodies, normal hearing, normal renal function and absent cataracts. The patient has macrothrombocytes with an average manual platelet count of 100 x 109/L. Immunofluorescence confocal microscopy using an antibody specific for NMMHC-IIA revealed unique localization of NMMHC-IIA in the patient’s leukocytes. Platelets and leukocytes from both parents and one sister are normal. Megakaryocytes cultured from the patient’s and one parent’s peripheral blood CD34+ cells also demonstrated abnormal distribution of NMMHC-IIA in only the patient’s megakaryocytes. Ultrastructural analysis using electron microscopy revealed distinct inclusion bodies in the patient’s leukocytes and megakaryocytes that were not observed in either parent. The patient’s macrothrombocytopenia together with the abnormal distribution of NMMHC-IIA within leukocytes is highly suggestive of a MYH9-related disorder. The absence of these findings in either parent suggested a de novo MYH9 mutation. We therefore sought to identify the mutation via amplification and DNA sequencing of all MYH9 exons and intron/exon boundaries. Exons 1, 10, 16, 24, 25, 26, 30, 38 and 40 representing all of the previously described mutations in MYH9-related disorders were found to be normal. Surprisingly, the remaining MYH9 gene exons and intron/exon boundaries were also normal. This unexpected finding suggests that another factor is involved in the normal assembly and/or localization of NMMHC-IIA in human leukocytes and megakaryocytes. It also suggests that a deficiency of this factor may lead to congenital macrothrombocytopenia with features indistinguishable from those of MYH9-related disorders. Identification of this factor could enhance our understanding of NMMHC-IIA-related congenital macrothrombocytopenias and would allow us to gain insights into the normal assembly and/or function of NMMHC-IIA in human megakaryocytes and platelets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→