MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2596381929 · doi:10.1093/biolreprod/87.s1.508

Pattern of Ovarian Gene Expression and Estrous Cyclicity in Mouse Lacking Nr5a2 in Granulosa Cells of Antral Follicles.

2012· article· en· W2596381929 on OpenAlexaff
Kalyne Bertolin, Anne‐Marie Bellefleur, Mira Dobias Goff, Vickie Roussel, Rajesha Duggavathi, Jan A. Gossen, Bruce D. Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill UniversityCegep de Saint Hyacinthe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyEstrous cycleFollicular phaseAntral follicleOvaryOvulationOvarian follicleAndrologyHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The orphan nuclear receptor Nr5a2, also known as liver receptor homolog-1, has been shown to regulate several reproductive events in mice, including ovulation, luteinization and female fertility. Depletion of Nr5a2 specifically in granulosa cells of antral follicles using transgenic mice caused the formation of a non-functional luteal-like structure, low progesterone synthesis, irregular mating frequency, anovulation and infertility. Our objectives were to establish whether the above-mentioned female mice present normal estrous cyclicity, and to determine the basis of the failure in progesterone levels by gene expression analysis of the ovaries. We generated granulosa-specific knockout mice by crossing Nr5a2-floxed and cytochrome P450 aromatase (Cyp19) Cre mice (cKO, genotype: Nr5a2f/f; tgCyp19Cre/+). A group of cKO adult females (n=5) and the not-knockout littermates (CON; n=5) were evaluated daily by vaginal cytology to determine the phase of the estrous cycle. The cKO females presented normal cycles with a length of 4 to 5 days, in accordance to the pattern showed by the control group. Females were then housed with reproductively proven males, examined for copulatory plugs and euthanized 5.5 days post-coitum. Estradiol measurement in follicular fluid and in serum showed that there is no difference of levels between cKO and CON females. It was shown in a published study that excising Nr5a2 in granulosa cells of small follicles results in an abnormal prolonged estrus phase, due to reduced levels of nitric oxide synthase Nos3 mRNA, leading to increased intrafollicular estradiol levels. There was no difference in Nos3 mRNA abundance between the cKO and CON mice. By comparing cKO and CON levels we show that progesterone synthesis is affected by the lack of Nr5a2 through the downregulation of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, StAR (p<0.01), and scavenger receptor B 1, Scarb1 (p<0.01), but not of the cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage, Cyp11a1 or Cyp19a1. This indicates that Nr5a2 is important for the regulation of the cholesterol transport genes, but not for the genes involved in cholesterol transformation during steroidogenesis in our conditional knockout mouse model. Moreover, the vascular endothelial growth factor A, Vegfa, an angiogenesis gene, showed a downregulation (p<0.05) in ovaries lacking Nr5a2 in granulosa cells of antral follicles, while Vegfb was not affected. The matrix metalloproteinase 2, Mmp2, a gene related to tissue remodeling, is upregulated (p<0.05) in cKO ovaries when compared to CON ovaries. In conclusion, the absence of Nr5a2 in antral follicles, does not impair normal estrous cyclicity nor reduce intrafollicular and serum levels of estradiol. We conclude that the transport of cholesterol into the cells and into the mitochondria appears to be the limiting factor for the functionality of the luteal-like structures found in the cKO ovaries. Further, Nr5a2 regulates different categories of genes, including steroidogenic, angiogenic and remodeling genes. Supported by CIHR Operating Grant OGP 11018. KB is supported by FQRNT PBEEE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207