MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2596401107

Cuentas económicas de Galicia: Tercer trimestre de 2016 [Galicia's economic accounts: 2016 Third quarter]

2016· article· es· W2596401107 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fernando González Laxe, José Francisco Armesto-Pina, Santiago Lago Peñas, Patricio Sánchez Fernández

Bibliographic record

VenueMPRA Paper · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFinance, Taxation, and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)DynamismUnemploymentEconomicsGeographyDemographic economicsEconomyEconomic growth
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Galician economy continues with its positive path in the third quarter of the year taking into account the evolution of real GDP, employment and unemployment. On the one hand, the dynamism of the productive activity, with increasingly high positive interannual variation rates, translates into an increase one tenth higher than the Spanish average.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.009
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMPRA PaperSame topicFinance, Taxation, and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207