MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2596716325 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/716/1/712

SPECTRA AND<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>LIGHT CURVES OF SIX TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE AT 0.511 &lt;<i>z</i>&lt; 1.12 AND THE UNION2 COMPILATION

2010· article· en· W2596716325 on OpenAlexaff
R. Amanullah, C. Lidman, D. Rubin, G. Aldering, P. Astier, K. Barbary, M. S. Burns, A. Conley, Kyle Dawson, Susana E. Deustua, Mamoru Doi, S. Fabbro, L. Faccioli, H. K. Fakhouri, G. Folatelli, A. S. Fruchter, Hisanori Furusawa, G. Garavini, G. Goldhaber, A. Goobar, D. E. Groom, I. Hook, D. A. Howell, Nobunari Kashikawa, R. A. Knop, M. Kowalski, E. Linder, J. Meyers, Tomoki Morokuma, S. Nobili, J. Nordin, P. Nugent, L. Östman, R. Pain, N. Panagia, S. Perlmutter, J. Raux, P. Ruiz‐Lapuente, A. L. Spadafora, M. Strovink, N. Suzuki, L. Wang, W. M. Wood‐Vasey, Naoki Yasuda

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilStockholms UniversitetSpace Telescope Science InstituteJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceOffice of ScienceDrexel UniversityNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationHigh Energy PhysicsU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsRedshiftLight curveSupernovaPhotometry (optics)Hubble's lawHubble space telescopeAstronomyType (biology)CosmologySpectral lineGalaxyStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on work to increase the number of well-measured Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) at high redshifts. Light curves, including high signal-to-noise Hubble Space Telescope data, and spectra of six SNe Ia that were discovered during 2001, are presented. Additionally, for the two SNe with z > 1, we present ground-based J -band photometry from Gemini and the Very Large Telescope. These are among the most distant SNe Ia for which ground-based near-IR observations have been obtained. We add these six SNe Ia together with other data sets that have recently become available in the literature to the Union compilation. We have made a number of refinements to the Union analysis chain, the most important ones being the refitting of all light curves with the SALT2 fitter and an improved handling of systematic errors. We call this new compilation, consisting of 557 SNe, the Union2 compilation. The flat concordance ΛCDM model remains an excellent fit to the Union2 data with the best-fit constant equation-of-state parameter w = −0.997 +0.050 −0.054 (stat) +0.077 −0.082 (stat + sys together) for a flat universe, or w = −1.038 +0.056 −0.059 (stat) +0.093 −0.097 (stat + sys together) with curvature. We also present improved constraints on w ( z ). While no significant change in w with redshift is detected, there is still considerable room for evolution in w . The strength of the constraints depends strongly on redshift. In particular, at z ≳ 1, the existence and nature of dark energy are only weakly constrained by the data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0100.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,350
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207