Description de la littératie en santé des aînés à domicile au Saguenay souffrant de maladies chroniques, en lien avec leur utilisation des services de santé [ressource électronique]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La litteratie en sante (LES) est un concept qui se definit de facon generale comme les connaissances et competences en sante des individus. Il est etabli que l'atteinte d'un niveau adequat contribuerait a ameliorer la capacite d'autogestion et la qualite de vie des personnes atteintes des maladies chroniques (MC) ainsi qu'a reduire leur dependance face au systeme de sante. Cependant, une etude du Conseil canadien sur l'apprentissage (2007) a revele que seulement 12 % des personnes de plus de 65 ans possedent un niveau de LES juge adequat, a l'echelle du pays. Egalement, les connaissances concernant la LES et l'utilisation des differents types de services de sante par les aines sont peu approfondies dans la litterature, particulierement en region peripherique et eloignee. Dans ce contexte, le but de ce projet etait de decrire le niveau de LES des personnes âgees de 65 ans et plus du Saguenay, souffrant de MC et residant a domicile, en lien avec leur utilisation des services de sante.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".