Negotiating the Intersection of the Urban-Rural Divide and Gender in Contemporary China: Rural Female University Students
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article, based on a qualitative study of 54 rural female students attending urban Chinese higher education institutions from 2011 to 2012, contests the portrayal of such students as victims suffering from a low level of ability. My research reveals instead that these women exerted agency to recognize, negotiate, and resist both the urban-rural divide and patriarchy, both of which shaped their lives and identities. My research findings also reveal that their lives were multidimensional and diverse, and thus their situations could not be explained by analyzing the effects of either the urban-rural divide or gender alone, but rather by engaging in an analysis of interlocking power structures. The participants’ identities were fluid and in a constant process of formation as they negotiated the various forms of patriarchy they encountered when they moved from their rural homes to attend the urban academies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it