Three Lectures Delivered in the Cathedral of St. George, Kingston, in Advent 1869, by the Bishop of Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Here is the true motive to learn the Old Testament.The more a man is imbued with the spirit of the Old Testament, and the more he can enter into the habits and customs, the rites and ceremonies, the civil and religious government of the Jews, the more truly can he see the meaning and understand the force of the New Testament Revelation.Without this preparatory training, the significance as well as the beauty of New Testament language is in a great measure lost.Many passages cannot be understood in a theological sense, unless they are first understood in an archaeological one.cc Nonpossunt intelligi theologice, nisi prius intelligantur archccologice" Next to an -accurate knowledge of Jewish archaeology, nothing would aid a student of the New Testament so much as to read it under the guidance and tuition of a scholarly Jew.A flood of light would thus be poured upon the doctrines and discipline of the Kingdom of Christ-the Church.What marvellous associations cluster round that word-Church !What deeds of heroism, what sufferings and joys unspeakable ; what magnificent institutions ; what immortal literature, are due to the Society called the Church !And yet,Christians are sadly divided regarding its nature and organization, though they agree, indeed, in saying that no description of its structure can be the right one, unless it correspond with the accounts given in the earliest Christian Writings, the NewTestament.* Ii we may venture to assign a reason why we do not find the expression Church of Christ in the 'New Testament, we may find it in the fact that the Church is God's in a sense in which it is not Christ's.Christ is its Mediatorial King, but only till the consummation of all things, " when He shall have delivered up the Kingdom to God even the Father," and " then shall the Son also Himself be subject unto Him that put all things under Him, that God may be all in all."-ICor.xv.24-28.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.138 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".