MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2596989523 · doi:10.1166/jnn.2017.13309

Optical Limiting in Cu/CuO Nanostructures Formed by Magnetic Field-Assisted Anodization

2017· article· en· W2596989523 on OpenAlexaff
Arash Mohammadpour, Mohammed Khairy El-Tahlawy, Albert Martino, Abdelrahman M. Askar, Ryan Kisslinger, R. Fedosejevs, Karthik Shankar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceAnodizingNanostructureSapphireFluenceCopperThin filmOptoelectronicsTransmittanceNanotechnologyLaserOpticsComposite materialAluminiumMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recently developed magnetic field-assisted electroless anodization technique enables more morphological tunability by expanding the parameter space available during nanostructure synthesis and limiting the effects of copper electromigration. We synthesized CuO nanodendrites, nanowalls and nanospheres on both transparent and non-transparent substrates using the magnetic field-assisted anodization of copper foils and vacuum deposited Cu thin films on glass substrates respectively. Non-linear optical characterization of the resulting partially transparent Cu/CuO nanostructures on glass substrates revealed clear optical limiting behavior. When the fluence of the incident 800 nm radiation from a Ti:sapphire laser was increased from 20 mJ cm −2 to 2 J cm −2 , the optical transmittance of the Cu/CuO nanostructures decreased by nearly an order of magnitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nanoscience and NanotechnologySame topicNanofabrication and Lithography TechniquesFrench-language works237,207