Laminar, Radial Flow of Two Immiscible Fluids in Slender Wedge-Shaped Passages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Jeffery–Hamel problem for laminar, radial flow between two nonparallel plates has been extended to the case of two immiscible fluids in slender channels. The governing continuity and momentum equations were solved numerically using the fourth-order Runge–Kutta method. Solutions were obtained for air–water at standard conditions over the void-fraction range of 0.4–0.8 (due to its practical significance) and the computations were limited to conditions where unique solutions were found to exist. The void fraction, pressure gradient, wall friction coefficient, and interfacial friction coefficient are dependent on the Reynolds numbers of both fluids and the complex nature of this dependence is presented and discussed. An attempt to use a one-dimensional two-fluid model with simplified assumptions succeeded in producing a qualitatively similar form of the void-fraction dependence on the two Reynolds numbers; however, quantitatively there are significant deviations between these results and those of the complete model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".