MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2597146165

La introducción del concepto de competencia en el análisis didáctico de las prácticas de enseñanza: el caso de la enseñanza de Ciencias Humanas en la educación básica de Quebec

2009· article· es· W2597146165 on OpenAlex
Johanne Lebrun, Anderson Araújo‐Oliveira

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePensamiento Educativo, Revista de Investigación Latinoamericana (PEL) · 2009
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Practices and Policies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesCompetence (human resources)SociologyPhilosophyPsychologySocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors use the teaching of Human Sciences, at primary level in Quebec, as an example to provide a critical view regarding the relevance and role that school subject knowledge has acquired in students’ development of competences. To that end, they refer to the three models of competences described in the first section of this article. The second part defines the dimensions used in the study followed by a description of how school subjects are conformed. This conformation is in turn, a result of each competence model according to selected dimensions. The article concludes with some key ideas which could help to extend as well as adapt the frame of didactic analysis in the competence based teaching.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it