SNPknow: a web server for functional annotation of cattle SNP markers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wang, Q., Zhao, H. and Pan, Y. 2011. SNPknow: a web server for functional annotation of cattle SNP markers. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 91: 247–253. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) microarray technology provides new insights to identify the genetic factors associated with the traits of interest. To meet the immediate need for a framework of genome-wide association study (GWAS), we have developed SNPknow, a suite of CGI-based tools that provide enrichment analysis and functional annotation for cattle SNP markers and allow the users to navigate and analysis large sets of high-dimensional data from the gene ontology (GO) annotation systems. SNPknow is the only web server currently providing functional annotations of cattle SNP markers in three commercial platforms and dbSNP database. The web server may be particularly beneficial for the analysis of combining SNP association analysis with the gene set enrichment analysis and is freely available at http://klab.sjtu.edu.cn/SNPknow .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.051 | 0.073 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".