MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2597308688 · doi:10.1353/mou.2002.0033

Aristoxenos, Περί βίων and Peripatetic Biography

2002· article· fr· W2597308688 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
C. H. Thompson Cooper

Bibliographic record

VenueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Étude des élèments constitutifs du genre biographique et de ses liens avec Aristoxenos et les œuvres des péripatéticiens intitulées Vies (ou Types de vie ?). Nous concluons que la biographie était, pendant l’Antiquité, une vaste souscatégorie de l’historiographie et qu’elle pouvait alors couvrir tout récit de vie — celle d’un personage, d’une cité. d’une nation, de leurs origines à leur fin. La manière d’écrire une biographie, les éléments qui y figuraient ne préoccupaient pas les Anciens, pas plus qu’ils ne se souciaient de sa ressemblance avec d’autres formes d’historiographie. En fait, tout récit de vie pouvait figurer parmi cette vaste sous-catégorie de l’historiographie appelée Bioi. Par conséquent, une æuvre que les Modernes ne compteraient pas parmi les véritables biographies aurait été perçue comme telle par les lecteurs de l’Antiquité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of CanadaSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207