MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT): A Pilot Study.

2004· article· en· W2597368060 on OpenAlexaff
Ellen McDonald, Germain Poirier, Paul C. Hébert, Joe Pagliarello, Graeme Rocker, Stéphane Langevin, François LeBlanc, Geeta Mehta, Yoanna Skrobik, Robert Fowler, John Granton, Andreas Freitag, Graham L. Jones, Maureen O. Meade, Gordon Guyatt, David R. Anderson, Bill Geerts, Mark Crowther, Nicole Zytaruk, Lauren E. Griffith

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoDalhousie UniversityUniversity of OttawaMcMaster UniversityUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePulmonary embolismHeparinRandomized controlled trialRandomizationLow molecular weight heparinSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale: No published randomized trials have compared low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to unfractionated heparin (UFH) for thromboprophylaxis in medical-surgical ICU patients. Objectives: A) Our Feasibility Objectives were to assess: 1) timely enrollment and complete, blinded study drug administration, 2) LMWH bioaccumulation in renal insufficiency, 3) twice weekly leg ultrasounds, and 4) recruitment rates for a future trial. B) Our Clinical Objectives were to assess 1) the effectiveness of LMWH vs UFH by estimating DVT, and pulmonary embolism (PE) rates, and 2) the safety of LMWH vs UFH regarding bleeding, thrombocytopenia and HIT. Methods: In this prospective randomized stratified concealed blinded multicenter trial, we included patients ≥18 with expected ICU stay ≥72h. We excluded trauma, orthopaedic, cardiac, or neurosurgery, severe hypertension, DVT, PE or hemorrhage within 3 mos, INR >2ULN, PTT >2ULN, platelets <100 x109/L, creatinine clearance <30ml/min, therapeutic anticoagulation, >2 doses of heparin, and palliative care patients. By centralized telephone randomization, we allocated patients to dalteparin 5,000 IU QD SC or UFH 5,000 IU BID SC. All clinicians caring for patients were blinded except the pharmacist. Bilateral leg compression ultrasounds were performed within 48h of ICU admission, twice weekly, on suspicion of DVT, and 7 days post ICU discharge. Results: A) Feasibility Objectives: 1) Timely, complete study drug administration occurred for >99% of scheduled doses; every dose was blinded. 2) No LWMH bioaccumulation was observed as measured by anti-Xa levels when creatinine clearance decreased to <30 ml/min. 3) Ultrasounds were performed without exception. 4) Estimated recruitment for a future trial is 4–5 patients/month/center. B) Clinical Objectives: 1) Effectiveness: Among 128 patients, 11 (8.6 %) had DVT, 2 (1.6 %) had PE. 2) Safety: 6 (4.7 %) had clinically important bleeds, 23 (18 %) had minor bleeds, 4 (3.1%) developed a platelet count <50 x109/L, and 2 (0.8%) had HIT diagnosed by serotonin release assay. Conclusions: DVT rates remain high in medical-surgical ICU patients despite universal heparin thromboprophylaxis. This pilot study suggests that a randomized clinical trial comparing LMWH vs UFH feasible. An adequately powered trial is needed to achieve the clinical objectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→French-language works237,207→