Analytical Investigation of Precast Panel and its Utilization in Low Cost Housing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Emigration toward metropolis for employments refugees to better country urbanization and globalization are the main reasons to scarcity of housing and increase in slum habitation. Slum dwelling is the challenge to both developed and under developed nation. Honorable Prime Minister of India has also dreamed to provide everyone shelter by 2020 under various housing schemes. There should be some advancement in construction practices and rational approach to use of material for low cost housing to achieve. From all the study and research done in the field of precast tilt up concrete and RCC wall panels its use as a structural member is clear, this paper explains the method to use of panel alone as a structural element for the construction of low cost frameless housing. Panel structure would be without beam and column erected on RCC tilt up wall panel with same panel is to be used in flooring. Capacity of wall panel can also be easily access due to advancement of latest method and research done in this segment. Two models are done one with Conventional RCC frame structure and other with frameless RCC panel structure with same plan in Etabs-15. Comparative results between two models are to be determined for static load and seismic effect in base shear, time period and displacement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it