Attitudes of Taiwanese College Students toward Marriage: A Comparative Study of Different Family Types and Gender
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous researchers reported that parental conflict seems to have considerable influence on children’s marital attitudes. The present study examined the status and the relationships between parental conflict and students’ attitudes toward marriage among Taiwanese college students. The “Parental Marital Conflict Scale” and “Marital Attitude Scale” were used as research tools, and data from 1,113 college students were analyzed. We utilized SPSS software to analyze the data and to shed light on whether there are significant differences between genders and between different family types with regard to attitudes toward marriage. The findings show that increased levels of parental conflict had a negative influence on students’ attitudes toward marriage. Male students’ attitudes toward marriage were more positive than females in general, and students from intact families or families with lower parental conflict reported more positive attitudes toward marriage when compared with those from non-intact families or families with higher parental conflict. We conclude that future studies are needed to better understand these and other factors that influence attitudes towards marriage and possible proactive strategies that might prevent marital problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".