MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2597474861

Behaviour and Space Use of Sea Lamprey Near Traps at a Hydroelectric Generating Station

2014· dissertation· en· W2597474861 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Andrew M. Rous

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaU.S. Geological SurveyU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceGreat Lakes Fishery Commission
KeywordsLampreyHydroelectricitySpace (punctuation)FisheryMarine engineeringOceanographyEnvironmental scienceGeographyEngineeringGeologyElectrical engineeringComputer scienceBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Invasive species are the focus of management concern in many ecosystems. Trapping is a potentially valuable form of control. I used telemetry to track sea lamprey immediately downstream of traps at a hydro-generating station. I tested if manipulations of discharge influenced the behaviour of lamprey in a manner that increased their susceptibility to trapping. Encounter rates with traps increased when discharge was high, but rates of departure without entering traps simultaneously increased. I further tested whether lower trapping success is a consequence of space use by lamprey immediately downstream of traps. Lamprey aggregated away from where traps were located. Differences in vertical space use with respect to discharge suggest that flows exiting the generating station attract sea lamprey to the station wall, but also away from the traps. To improve trap success, managers must make traps more attractive or place traps in locations where lamprey are most likely to aggregate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207