Monitoring vineyards with UAV and multi-sensors for the assessment of water stress and grape maturity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper deals with the monitoring of vineyards for the assessment of water stress and grape maturity using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) equipped with multispectral/infrared and red-green-blue (RGB) cameras. The study area is the Gerovassiliou winery in the region of Epanomi, Greece, cultivated with the local grape variety of Malagouzia. Fifteen flights were conducted with a fixed-wing UAV during the months of April to August 2015 with a mean interval of 2 weeks. The flight images were photogrammetrically processed for the production of orthoimages and then used to extract indices for the detection of water stress. Grape samples were collected 2 days before harvest and then analyzed and correlated with remote sensing indices. The TCARI/OSAVI index showed the best correlation with the grape samples with regards to maturity and the likelihood of water stress. Furthermore, the final results were of high resolution as far as farm purposes are concerned (a scale of 1:500 for all three sensors). These facts suggest that the instruments used in this study represent a fast, reliable, and efficient solution to the evaluation of crops for agricultural applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".