MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2597525672

From Unemployment to Sustainable Livelihoods in Ottawa's Technology Sector (Working Paper 44)

2007· article· en· W2597525672 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ging Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLivelihoodUnemploymentLabour economicsEconomic growthEconomicsBusinessGeographyAgriculture
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since submission of the draft report to the OECD‐LEED Program on 30 June 2007, a unique
\nseven‐years retrospective study of the unemployed high technology workers was released by
\nStatistics Canada.1 Drawing upon Statistics Canada’s confidential Longitudinal Worker File –
\nitself constructed from four administrative data sources that linked Records of Employment and
\ntax filer information by the Social Insurance Number and firm‐level data by a company identifier
\n– this study was able to identify and trace the re‐employment of those permanently laid off in
\nthe high‐tech industry by location. The findings are stunning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207